Loading...
道德资本何以可能？
王, 小锡 Wang, Xiao xi
王, 小锡
Wang, Xiao xi
Author(s)
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
GE Subjects
Files
Loading...
道德资本何以可能.pdf
Adobe PDF, 1.26 MB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
Abstract in Chinese: 在本世纪初，我提出了“道德资本”的概念。围绕这一议题，学界有撰文认同的，也有撰文批评或商榷。本论文旨在对一些质疑作回应，在匡正常识性学术错误的同时，进一步阐述我的道德资本观。首先，道德资本与马克思提出的资本的本性有着本质区别；其次，道德资本与道德资本化没有逻辑联系；第三，道德资本同样不会使道德工具化；最后，道德资本不会败坏社会风气，具有客观必然性。Abstract in English: Marxist economics, Keynesian economics and neoliberalism economics are three modern schools of economic thought, where Marx, Keynesian, Hayek and Freedman are among the most prominent writers. The conflict of Marxist economics and the other two theories is that the purpose of Marxist economics is to serve the working public, while the other two theories is to maintain capitalist regeme. Marxist economists agree that the wealth growth should accord with Man’s overall devel-opment. While both neoliberalism economics and Keynesian economics regard wealth maximation as their common research purpose whithout regard to humanism. [pp. 237-238]
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Book chapter
Date
2016
Identifier
ISBN
9782889311057
DOI
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND 2.5; see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/legalcode)