MacDonald, Cathy2019-09-252019-09-252010-07-2520081705-7841http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/175249"Aboriginal women have lower rates of cervical cancer screening and higher rates of cervical cancer in Canada (Johnson, Boyd, and MacIsaac, 2004). Cervical cancer remains 1.8 to 3.6 times higher for Aboriginal women in comparison to non-Aboriginal women in Canada (Young et al., 2000). Yet, policymakers and researchers have shown little interest in the issues and challenges facing Aboriginal women. Despite the innovative actions in the last 15 years in Canada, Aboriginal women’s health is poorly understood; understanding requires resources that address the economic, social, and political realities of women’s lives (Dion Stout, Kipling, and Stout, 2001; Health Canada, 2004). Cancer care literature reflects the dominant values and beliefs of Western healthcare upon which cancer care and care prevention have been structured. This patriarchal perspective of health care negates much of Aboriginal women’s health and their traditional ways of knowing (Battiste, 2000; Graveline, 1998). The ethnocentric perspective, which dominates Western healthcare, suggests that one set of values and beliefs will be used as the standard for all health care, disregarding other ways of knowing and doing. Western value systems, particularly health care systems, are linear, singular, static, and objective. In direct contrast, Aboriginal tradition and ways of knowing encompass interconnectedness and holism (Battiste, 2000). [...]", Introduction, p. 96engWith permission of the license/copyright holderhealth ethicsCareCancermedical carecultureresearch ethicsenvironmentwomanBioethicsCommunity ethicsHealth ethicsMinority ethicsArticle