Ré, Flávia Maria2019-09-252019-09-252016-06-2020151517-0128http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/153968"Este artigo busca apresentar um paralelo entre duas concepções liberais de justiça contemporâneas produzidas no campo da teoria política normativa. O objetivo é identificar as principais objeções de Robert Nozick à teoria de justiça de John Rawls e apontar quais os componentes normativos presentes na sua teoria proposta em Anarquia, Estado e utopia" ["This article seeks to present a parallel between two liberal conceptions of contemporary justice to the field of normative political theory. The goal is to identify the main objections of Robert Nozick to John Rawls theory of justice and indicate which regulatory components present in his theory proposed in Anarchy, State and Utopia"]porWith permission of the license/copyright holderlibertarianismliberal-egalitarianRobert NozickJohn RawlsPolitical ethicsEthics of political systemsEthics of lawRights based legal ethicsMethods of ethicsPhilosophical ethicsUm paralelo entre duas concepções liberais de justiça [A parallel between two liberal conceptions of justice]Article