Sparks, Adam2019-09-252019-09-252016-09-062008http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/156948"Th israel analogy relies on a correspondence between the chronologically pre-messianic and the epistemologically pre-messianic and in so doing requires the ‘b.c. condition’ to continue today. Thre is no sense in which the ‘b.c. condition’ can exist after the cross, and therefore, the israel analogy and fulfiment model with its reliance on a present continuation of a pre-messianic paradigm is substantially weakened."engWith permission of the license/copyright holdersalvation HistoryChronologyCrisisTheology of religionsTimes of IgnoranceComparative religion and interreligious dialogueHistory of religionPhilosophy of religionDogmaticsSalvation/liberationArticle