D. Rathod, Sujit2019-09-252019-09-252012-03-212012-010975-5691http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/184246"The importance of this sort of basic scientific investigation cannot be overstated. In the absence of evidence from randomised control trials, guidelines around cancer screening rely on data generated from observational studies. By determining the incidence and prevalence of women with carcinoma in situ, and identifying the features of dysplasia associated with progression to carcinoma in situ, this research could support health policy makers’ efforts to increase capacity and to precisely target the treatment of cervical cancer. The primary beneficiaries of the findings of this kind of research would be those populations most affected by cervical cancer - who happen to be women in developing countries. The burden of research participation should be borne by a sample drawn from populations expected to benefit from the results of the research findings. Thus it is just and appropriate that women in developing countries were enrolled in this study."(pg 57)engWith permission of the license/copyright holderObservational researchmedical carecervical dysplasiaThe Belmont Report (1979)World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki (1964 and 1975)The Nuremberg Code (1949)BioethicsSocial ethicsSexual orientation/genderMedical ethicsHealth ethicsArticle