Mihut, Cristian2021-04-212021-04-212014-11-122014-080953-946810.1177/0953946814530226http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4022970Danaher suggests that doxological justice, grounded in an acute receptivity of the generosity of God, can decenter our current notions of justice. Instead I focus on what might be called doxological forgiveness, that is, grace-responsive forgiveness. The first section argues that a conception of forgiveness which I dub repentance-responsive is compatible with and even requires holding punitive attitudes. The second section sketches the alternative account of grace-responsive forgiveness. Those who embody this virtue have epistemic and theological warrant to entirely disavow punitive emotions. The third section argues that God embodies a grace-responsive forgiveness that undermines retributivism and eclipses repentance-responsive forgiveness.Magazine/JournalengSAGE PublicationsDivine forgivenessgracepunitive emotionsrestorative justiceretributive justiceReligious ethicsSpirituality and ethicsMethods of ethicsTheological ethicsPhilosophical ethicsArticle