Benghozi, Pierre-Jean2023-02-162023-02-162023978288931517810.58863/20.500.12424/4271544http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4271544The counterpart of academic freedom and scientific autonomy is personal and collective responsibility. This responsibility must be based on contractual foundations in relation to the objectives of knowledge. Ensuring scientific integrity therefore requires the institutionalisation of integrity practices, rather than a mechanical incentive to ethical behaviour. This implies first sharing a reference framework with all actors, and then setting up action mechanisms. The following chapter emphasises the importance of initiating integrity procedures in institutions through the certification of doctoral schools: it presents the various types of action to which institutions must respond in the face of possible breaches: guiding principles, involvement of managers, communication, monitoring and control, training, handling of complaints and sanctions.engGlobethics PublicationsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/research ethicsresearch integrityResearch ethicsBook chapter