Crisp, Oliver2019-09-252019-09-252016-09-142003http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/157087"It is notorious among theologians that Karl Barth defends doctrines of election and atonement that appear to lead to universalism, but that Barth steadfastly maintained did not lead to universalism. As Jiingel records it, Barth emphatically claimed, 'I do not teach it (universalism), but I also do not teach it'.1 There have been many who are willing to defend Barth in this matter. For instance, John Colwell claims that:"engWith permission of the license/copyright holderUniversalismelectionatonementKarl BarthBiblical TheologyDogmaticsThe human beingSalvation/liberationApologetics and polemicsArticle