Loading...
Human Rights and Corruption
Transparency International
Transparency International
Author(s)
Transparency International
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Keywords
GE Subjects
Collections
Files
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
"Although states’ commitments to international anti-corruption and human rights regimes can run parallel to each other, they are rooted in the same principles: equal participation, accountability, democratisation, empowerment and inclusion of the marginalised. When put into practice, these concepts can be used to better the situation of individuals as well as to improve the functioning of states, linking human rights and anti-corruption work in a common set of objectives.2 However, the anti-corruption (AC) and human rights (HR) movements employ a different language to describe their work. The points discussed below juxtapose the terms used by each, revealing potential linkages for a common plan of action. Combating political and judicial corruption (AC) / Guaranteeing civil and political rights (HR) The anti-corruption movement has been fighting political and judicial corruption to achieve better participation and representation of citizens in a democracy. It gathers information and promotes transparency to empower individuals to make informed decisions when they participate in their country’s democratic processes. The space for civil society to act in both the human rights and anti-corruption arenas is determined by governments fulfilling civil liberties and respecting rights such as the freedom of information, freedom of association and the right to peaceful assembly.3 Lacking these conditions, the work of anti-corruption advocates and human rights activists is endangered and the achievement of accountability and transparency in the public sector is made impossible. For example, corruption in electoral contests distorts the democratic process, directly undermining the right of citizens to participate in their own government. This leads to a misrepresentation in political decision-making, since the people put into power are not independent in their decisions or representative of their electorate.4 According to TI's Global Corruption Barometer, political parties and parliaments are perceived to be the most corrupt entities in a state."
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Journal
Date
2008
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder