Loading...
Polio eradication and ethical issues
John, T Jacob
John, T Jacob
Author(s)
John, T Jacob
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Keywords
GE Subjects
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Medical ethics
Collections
Files
Loading...
ijme_4_2005.pdf
Adobe PDF, 29.73 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
"Yash Paul's paper (1) raises several technical questions about polio eradication. The ethical issues are implicit, but must be made explicit. Although disease control decisions are based on epidemiologic and economic considerations, any intervention involving people has ethical implications. In 1978 the Government of India decided to use oral polio vaccine (OPV) to control polio, occurring then at the average rate of 500 cases per day (2). The primary vaccination schedule was three doses in infancy. The prevailing popular belief (based on theory, not evidence) was that vaccine viruses would spread in the community, immunise unvaccinated children, induce high herd effect, and control polio rapidly. The alternate choice, the injectable polio vaccine (IPV), marginally more expensive, was believed to protect only the vaccinated. Thus, OPV was (erroneously) considered the better 'public health' vaccine."
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2005-10
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder