Ethical challenges in care for older patients who resist help
Brodtkorb, Kari Skisland, Anne Valen-Sendstad Slettebø, Åshild Skaar, Ragnhild
Brodtkorb, Kari
Skisland, Anne Valen-Sendstad
Slettebø, Åshild
Skaar, Ragnhild
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
GE Subjects
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background:Situations where patients resist necessary help can be professionally and ethically challenging for health professionals, and the risk of paternalism, abuse and coercion are present.Research question:The purpose of this study was to examine ethical challenges in situations where the patient resists healthcare.Research design:The method used was clinical application research. Academic staff and clinical co-researchers collaborated in a hermeneutical process to shed light on situations and create a basis for new action.Participants and research context:Four research groups were established. Each group consisted of six to eight clinical co-researchers, all employees with different health profession backgrounds and from different parts of the municipal healthcare services, and two scientific researchers.Ethical considerations:The study was conducted in compliance with ethical guidelines and principles. Participants were informed that participation was voluntary and that confidentiality would be maintained. They signed a consent form.Findings:The findings showed that the situations where patients opposed help related to personal hygiene, detention in an institution and medication associated with dental treatment. The situations were perceived as demanding and emotionally stressful for the clinicians.Discussion:The situations can be described as everyday ethics and are more characterised by moral uncertainty and moral distress than by being classic ethical dilemmas.Conclusion:Norwegian legislation governing the use of force seems to provide decision guidance with the potential to reduce uncertainty and moral stress if the clinicians’ legal competence had been greater.
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2015-09-01
Identifier
SAGE-10.1177/0969733014542672
ISSN-PRINT-0969-7330
ISSN-ELECT-1477-0989
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733014542672
ISSN-PRINT-0969-7330
ISSN-ELECT-1477-0989
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733014542672
ISBN
DOI
10.1177/0969733014542672
Copyright/License
© The Author(s) 2014