Loading...
COGNITIVE PERCEPTUAL DISSONANCE THEORY ON THE MORAL RELATIVISM FIELD
Féminis, Carlos
Féminis, Carlos
Author(s)
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Collections
Files
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
This presentation is based on an research that it intends to verify the work hypothesis that supposes that the people emit judgments about facts and circumstances with an ethical relativismo, showing a “cognitive dissonance” in the perception of the consequences of the human conduct on social life The research must be considered provisory. It is will continued analyzing and still obtaining conclusions. Have been found ranks of measurement in the ethical relativism. This relativism is it in the judgments that the people emit and we denominated “Sanctionary Judgments”, because they are truly sanctions or penalties that people applies over the subjects that carry out the reproachable facts. In order to make possible to obtain "Sanctionary Judgments", we has resorted to 1000 (thousands) “Critical Incidents”. This C. I. were extracted of many news of several newspapers referred to divers fields; family, education, government, police, etc. This C. I. were grouped in lists on forms distributed in groups of 50 (fifty) separated: 25 (twenty-five) “SLIGHTS” and 25 (twenty-five) “SERIOUS”. This qualification was done by the investigator previously by other processes of universal measurement. This research, has allowed to establish an inconsistency between the sanctionaries judgments of people and the universal qualifications that could the facts deserve. The judgments of people always are precarious, emotional and irrational. They are due to a perception problem, for that reason we denominated to this end “PERCEPTIVE CONGITIVA DISSONANCE; ”. Also we has detected the people behave with two degrees of ethics; a LAX ETHICS and a STRICT ETHICS, which, combined with the previous qualification of SLIGHT EFFECT and SERIOUS EFFECT; it produces four types of conduct in which it is possible classify the people
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Conference proceedings
Date
2012
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder