Loading...
Relevance Theory and the Translation of Scripture
Jobes, Karen H.
Jobes, Karen H.
Author(s)
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Keywords
Collections
Files
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
"In recent years the religion of Islam has assumed much greater prominence in western society than ever before.1 One of the striking differences between Islam and Christianity is in the doctrine of Scripture. Muslims revere their foundational text, the Koran, as God’s word and consequently insist that it must not be translated and should be read only in the language in which Mohammed wrote it, namely Arabic. Any edition of the Koran in a modern language is considered to be an interpretation of or a commentary on the Koran. In contrast, Christianity from its earliest days translated the OT and NT into various languages of the Mediterranean world. Following Catholic opposition to vernacular translations in the medieval period, the Protestant Reformation renewed this practice, most famously by Martin Luther’s German translation. In fact, one of the corollaries of the Protestant Reformation principle of sola scriptura was the publication of the Bible in the language of the people. The Reformation probably would not have happened without Luther’s translation into German. Today evangelical Protestantism has zealously supported the translation of God’s word into all the languages of the world, as the mission of organizations such as Wycliffe Bible Translators and the International Bible Society attests. This difference in attitude toward Scripture is one of many between Christianity and Islam that reveals profound implications for how each religion perceives the nature of God and his relationship to humankind"
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2008
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder