Loading...
Author(s)
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Keywords
GE Subjects
Collections
Files
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
The counterpart of academic freedom and scientific autonomy is personal and collective responsibility. This responsibility must be based on contractual foundations in relation to the objectives of knowledge. Ensuring scientific integrity therefore requires the institutionalisation of integrity practices, rather than a mechanical incentive to ethical behaviour. This implies first sharing a reference framework with all actors, and then setting up action mechanisms. The following chapter emphasises the importance of initiating integrity procedures in institutions through the certification of doctoral schools: it presents the various types of action to which institutions must respond in the face of possible breaches: guiding principles, involvement of managers, communication, monitoring and control, training, handling of complaints and sanctions.
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Book chapter
Date
2023
Identifier
ISBN
9782889315178
DOI
10.58863/20.500.12424/4271544
Copyright/License
Globethics Publications
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International