Loading...
Transcendental arguments, how-possible questions and the aim of epistemology
Dohrn, Daniel
Dohrn, Daniel
Author(s)
Author(s) (Additional)
Illustrator(s)
Producer(s)
Contributor(s)
Contributor(s) (Other)
Editor(s)
Advisor(s)
Contact(s)
Data Collector(s)
Keywords
GE Subjects
Collections
Files
Loading...
vol_4_2009.pdf
Adobe PDF, 123.37 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
I want to start with resuming CassamĀ“s approach in its motivational structure. In The Possibility of Knowledge, Cassam develops his multi-level-approach (ML approach) by which he reacts to questions how a certain kind of knowledge is possible. How-possible questions arise in connection with considering obstacles which could interfere with the acquisition of knowledge. Faced with such obstacles, how is it possible for us to acquire a certain knowledge? An epistemological how-possible question requires at least two kinds of answers (Cassam 2007, 9-10)
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2009
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder